Friday, November 15, 2024
HomeeconomicsA Easy Desultory Analytic (Or How I Was Peter Turchin’d Into Perdition)...

A Easy Desultory Analytic (Or How I Was Peter Turchin’d Into Perdition) by “I misplaced my harmonica albrt”

[ad_1]

Yves right here. albrt is annoyed by Peter Turchin having produced a preferred ebook primarily based on what he depicts as quantitative evaluation spanning 10,000 years, each in that he doesn’t present his work and has not provide you with something novel. The subject is the mess we discover ourselves collectively in, of extra violence, widening variations between lessons mixed with much less earnings mobility, and political schisms. Turchin does say it is a prescription for revolution, though societies do typically handle to drag out of the dive path.

So one would possibly regard this put up as a mirrored image of the state of commentary on decline, with Turchin’s ebook Finish Occasions as the purpose of departure.

By albrt. Initially printed at his web site

Peter Turchin started his tutorial profession as an ecologist making use of data-intensive strategies to the research of animal inhabitants dynamics.  Within the late Nineteen Nineties he began making use of a few of these strategies to people.  He describes his work as complexity science, mixing pc modeling with large information analytics.  Turchin now claims to have gone a step additional and invented a brand new area of research he calls “cliodynamics,” utilizing large databases going again 10,000 years to establish patterns resulting in societal crises.

Turchin is a prolific tutorial writer, however he determined to put in writing a preferred ebook as a result of he has a message for People at present:

[W]hen a state, akin to america, has stagnating or declining actual wages (wages in inflation adjusted {dollars}), a rising hole between wealthy and poor, overproduction of younger graduates with superior levels, declining public belief, and exploding public debt, these seemingly disparate social indicators are literally associated to one another dynamically.  Traditionally, such developments have served as main indicators of looming political instability.  In america, all of those elements began to take an ominous flip within the Nineteen Seventies.  The information pointed to the years round 2020 when the confluence of those developments was anticipated to set off a spike in political instability.  And right here we’re.  Finish Occasions at xi.

Specifically, Finish Occasions identifies two structural-dynamic variables resulting in predictable crises all through human historical past:  overproduction of elite aspirants and in style immiseration.

I purchased Finish Occasions similtaneously The Fourth Turning is Right here by Neil Howe.  I discovered Howe’s writing type extra participating, so I learn his ebook first (5 half overview begins right here).  Finish Occasions was a little bit of a slog, regardless of being a lot shorter.  That stated, the ebook is value studying, or is at the least value studying a great overview.  Jack Goldstone, a colleague of Turchin’s who’s cited usually in Finish Occasions, had this to say:

Not like Turchin’s main earlier works, Finish Occasions is clearly an try to succeed in a a lot wider, non-scientific viewers.  The ebook has not a single graph, desk, or equation.  As a substitute, it presents its arguments partly via a collection of vignettes that includes largely invented people whose life-situation is used as an example the social developments being mentioned. . . .

The try to succeed in a broader viewers appears to have been profitable:  Finish Occasionsobtained opinions within the New York Occasions, the Guardian, and the Occasions of London.  Sadly, the worth of such broad response has been a regrettable oversimplification, resulting in a superficial dismissal—thus the headline on the overview within the Sunday Occasions learn “Finish Occasions by Peter Turchin overview: we’re in a large number, blame the elite … we simply have too lots of them now” (Glancy 2023).  To say that this trivializes a long time of analysis, primarily based on information protecting instances spanning millennia, is an understatement.

I now not observe any of the newspapers listed by Goldstone, however as a member of the coveted middlebrow goal market I feel Turchin bears a number of the duty for his strategies being trivialized in opinions of Finish Occasions.  The ebook usually fails to say when Turchin’s conclusions are primarily based on quantitative evaluation of historic information and when Turchin is simply riffing primarily based on his personal observations and information of historical past, which he appears to do pretty usually.

By utilizing “vignettes” and oversimplified explanations, it appears fairly clear Turchin is attempting to succeed in a demographic that may be a rung or two down the ladder from the elites talked about within the subtitle.  Trying to put in writing for the working class generally is a noble endeavor.  Whether or not Turchin will reach reaching the populace with Finish Occasionsstays to be seen, as we method the time when a paperback version might usually be anticipated to look (and simply in time for an election).

Background

By Turchin’s reckoning, a disaster is a comparatively short-term phenomenon that occurs inside an extended framework of integrative and disintegrative phases.  Throughout integrative phases a society is comparatively unified and resilient.  Throughout disintegrative phases, societies have inside battle and are extra prone to disaster and eventual collapse.  A disintegrative interval can proceed for a very long time and observe a rhythm.

One era fights an all-out civil conflict, however the subsequent era (“the sons”), scarred by this violence, retains uneasy peace.  The next era (“the grandsons”), who grew up not being instantly uncovered to violence, repeats the errors of the grandfathers.  This dynamic units up a recurrent cycle of violence of roughly fifty years in size (that’s, two human generations), which persists till the structural circumstances are by some means resolved, resulting in the following integrative section.  Finish Occasions at 30.

Price repeating—a disintegrative section in Turchin’s framework can final for a couple of fifty-year cycle of violence.  Turchin estimates that the primary disintegrative section in america lasted from roughly 1830 to 1930, with spikes of collective violence throughout the Civil Battle and an “instability peak round 1920.”  The US was in an integrative interval from 1930 to 1980, however then a brand new era of elites started dismantling “the pillars on which the postwar prosperity period was primarily based.”  Finish Occasions at 74.

One of many the reason why Turchin is getting consideration proper now could be as a result of he predicted in 2010 that america would see a “peak of political violence in 2020.”  Finish Occasions at 252.  Widespread media obsession with a riot in Washington DC in early January of 2021 gave Turchin a gap for a preferred ebook.  I’ve little or no confidence that political violence in america peaked with that DC riot, however I can undoubtedly get on board with the concept that america is in a long-lasting disintegrative section the place establishments are shedding legitimacy and social battle is growing.

To be clear, I don’t truly disagree with Turchin about a lot. If he have been merely an old style newspaper columnist saying no matter got here into his head (as newspaper columnists have been wont to do again within the days once I used to learn newspapers), I’d most likely agree with him 80 to 90 p.c of the time.  He looks like a clear-sighted man who has acquired a good quantity of data about historical past since becoming bored with animal inhabitants research and embarking on an autodidactic journey within the social sciences.  The place I get caught is attempting to determine his claims for an excellent leap in scientific technique and precision, which aren’t actually supported by the knowledge included in Finish Occasions.  Turchin’s large database, like a sort of social science MacGuffin, is mysteriously lacking from most of the segments in Finish Occasions that comprise attention-grabbing insights.

This isn’t to say that Turchin fails to assist his factors with proof.  Finish Occasions has a considerable variety of footnotes citing many books and journal articles.  However most of Turchin’s conclusions aren’t all that completely different from the conclusions different good and wise folks have reached by much less quantitative strategies of statement and reasoning over the previous two or three centuries.  As one reviewer put it, “not one of the part elements of his core imaginative and prescient is authentic – in truth, every is commonplace.”

I feel one of the best ways to method Turchin is to imagine he’s nonetheless a inhabitants ecologist, however now he’s engaged on the a lot more durable downside of attempting to determine the vital variables for human inhabitants dynamics.  He’s not attempting to evangelise an ideology, however he finally comes up in opposition to the issue that ideology and different subjective elements are vital to human inhabitants dynamics.  Turchin presumably has a greater understanding of the complexity/chaos idea a part of the issue than conventional philosophers and social scientists, however it isn’t clear that Turchin has a greater understanding of how human elements play into historic cycles.

The remainder of this overview will spotlight the principle variables mentioned in Finish Occasions, and take a look at to determine from the comparatively scant clues in Finish Occasions whether or not Turchin appears to be making progress with a quantitative method.

Essential Thesis Factors

As famous, the 2 large causes of instability in accordance with Turchin are in style immiseration and overproduction of elite aspirants.  Each are the results of what Turchin calls a “wealth pump.”  At any time when elites develop a system for extracting wealth from the broader financial system, normally by lowering wages in some style, then the populace is immiserated and too many elite aspirants are created.  The wealth pump operates on each of Turchin’s variables by taking from the poor and giving to the wealthy.

If you find yourself a member of the populace caught in considered one of these dynamics, probably the most constructive methods to flee from immiseration embody fleeing, changing into an elite aspirant your self, or organizing behind an elite aspirant who appears to be providing a greater deal. Much less constructive choices embody dying in a plague or a conflict. Instability will increase, regardless.

Well-liked immiseration and overproduction of elites comprise most of what Turchin calls the structural-dynamic side of his mannequin.  Turchin acknowledges two different “structural drivers,” a failing state sector and exterior geopolitical elements.  Finish Occasionsat 30.  The failure of state financing and legitimacy might be a great measure of how a lot a society is disintegrating, however logically this appears extra like an impact of the wealth pump dynamic moderately than an impartial variable.  Turchin says the geopolitical elements have much less impression on bigger, extra highly effective states, and he doesn’t appear to present a lot consideration to geopolitics in his forecast for twenty-first century America.

As Turchin describes it, the trail right into a disintegrative section is comparatively easy:  the wealth pump will get turned on, the folks get immiserated, and elite aspirants get uncontrolled.  The methods out of a disintegrative section are rather more different.  One of the best case is {that a} society can reform itself sufficient to make the populace cool down and get again to work, as america did from the Nineteen Thirties to the Sixties.  The worst instances embody civil conflict, civilizational collapse, or an epidemic that wipes out so many individuals that the wealth pump will get reversed by rising wages as a result of decrease provide of staff.

Turchin credit others, notably Jack Goldstone, for creating earlier structural-dynamic fashions.  Cliodynamics purportedly distinguishes itself from structural-dynamic approaches by accounting for much less quantifiable variables akin to tradition and beliefs.  Finish Occasions at 95.  The ebook doesn’t clarify all of the working elements of Turchin’s present mannequin, however so far as I can inform there are at the least 5 vital classes of variables:  in style immiseration and elite overproduction are the principle structural-dynamic variables that apply to all societies; tradition, ideology, and group of curiosity teams are comparatively impartial sociopolitical variables.

Well-liked Immiseration

The story of in style immiseration creating instability actually isn’t new.  Well-liked immiseration and unrest will be brought on to some extent by exterior elements akin to overpopulation, famine, or illness, however Turchin focuses on societal causes, notably the wealth pump.  Non-sociopolitical causes of immiseration are largely endogenous to the structural-dynamic mannequin, and in some instances truly result in a longer-term reversal of the wealth pump by decimating the labor pressure and creating larger wages for the remaining staff.

So the wealth pump enriches the elites and immiserates everybody else.  This simplification permits Turchin to bypass the previous couple of centuries of debate concerning the interior workings of political financial system.  Maybe it is a good factor—we will’t realistically count on the working class to learn your entire tangled mess that Marxism has change into.  As Turchin says greater than as soon as, his job is to construct a mannequin that is so simple as attainable however no less complicated.  Maybe it’s higher if we simply acknowledge that the working class is getting screwed and provides it a reputation that everybody can perceive.  “Wealth pump” looks like a great candidate.

Joe Biden and his handlers profess to have problem understanding why anybody in America at present would think about themselves immiserated, however frankly I don’t really feel a must make that case right here.  The wealth pump is visibly working in America at present, to the detriment of most individuals. Turchin supplies some statistics. Solely the willfully blind can’t see it.

Overproduction of Elite Aspirants

That is the piece of Turchin’s idea that’s getting probably the most consideration—the concept that when extra individuals are attempting more durable to get forward it would essentially result in instability. Upward mobility is meant to be a founding precept of American tradition and economics. If extra folks attempting to be upwardly cell inherently results in instability, that would appear type of unhealthy.

In Turchin’s phrases, “[e]lite overproduction develops when the demand for energy positions by elite aspirants massively exceeds their provide.”  Finish Occasions at 7.  When this occurs, elite aspirants start breaking the foundations increasingly more, resulting in instability.  In olden instances, “the pace with which the elite ranks might develop . . . was strongly influenced by the organic copy of the elites.”  Finish Occasions at 44.  As a take a look at of the elite overproduction idea, Turchin hypothesized that polygamous cultures ought to have shorter historic cycles than monogamous cultures throughout the center ages, and he claims that the info bear this out.  Finish Occasions at 45-46.

These days, elite aspirants are largely created by going to school.  “Overproduction of youth with superior levels has been probably the most vital consider driving societal upheavals, from the Revolutions of 1848 to the Arab Spring of 2011.”  Finish Occasions at 91.  Turchin subsequently makes use of “the time period class not in a Marxist sense (the place it’s outlined by the function of people within the manufacturing course of) however within the sense of a bunch of people who’ve the identical socioeconomic standing—most significantly, related ranges of wealth and academic attainment.”  Finish Occasions at 304 n.5.  Turchin says that having a four-year faculty diploma is a “rather more salient” indicator of sophistication than wealth “if we need to perceive the variety of life trajectories and social attitudes.”  Finish Occasions at 6.

Turchin means that by 2016 the inhabitants had sorted itself into two social lessons

whose well-being has been declining and, correspondingly, whose mass-mobilization potential has been rising.  The primary one is the immiserated noncredentialed working class.  The second is the annoyed aspirants inside the credentialed class.  Finish Occasions at 207.

For comfort because the dialogue will get extra political, I’ll name them “Workforce Immiserated” and “Workforce Educated.”

Workforce Immiserated consists primarily of the non-credentialed working class and of people who find themselves in even worse financial form than the working class.  This needs to be the standard constituency of the so-called democrat legacy faction that championed social security nets previous to Invoice Clinton’s reinvention of democratic politics.  Turchin observes that aggrieved rural and working-class reactionaries, christened deplorables by Hillary Clinton, have gotten a bigger fraction of Workforce Immiserated and offering a lot of the power behind Donald Trump.

Workforce Educated roughly corresponds to the Skilled Managerial Class or PMC.  However having a school diploma clearly doesn’t make you elite—certainly, that’s the purpose Turchin is making when he identifies elite overproduction as a key part of instability.  Credentialing establishments create elite aspirants moderately than elites.

Finish Occasions is notably inexact in defining precise elites as they exist in America at present.  At one level Turchin says that elites “are merely those that have extra social energy—the power to affect different folks.  A extra descriptive time period for elites is ‘energy holders.’”  Finish Occasions at 3.  Turchin typically appears to recommend that it is advisable be a billionaire to be really elite (or have another equal entry to energy); different instances Turchin means that a lot decrease stage functionaries could also be elite.  I suppose this is smart in a dynamic mannequin, the place adjustments to the relative standing of individuals and teams could also be extra vital than setting boundaries and classifying folks.

The essential dynamic right here is totally generic to what occurs in aspirant video games as they progress to their late phases.  Not like its milder variations, excessive competitors doesn’t result in the number of the perfect candidates, the candidates most suited to the positions.  Somewhat, it corrodes the foundations of the sport, the social norms and establishments that govern how society works in a practical approach. . . . [S]ome of these failed elite aspirants convert into radicalized counter-elites who’re motivated to destroy the unjust social order that has bred them.  Finish Occasions at 94-95.

Turchin states at one level that “the American ruling class is a coalition of the highest wealth holders (the 1 p.c) and the highest diploma holders (the ten p.c).”  Finish Occasionsat 203.  This looks like a good assertion on its face and a helpful rule of thumb, however it does probably not match with the relativistic aspirant dynamic.  Annoyed aspirants clearly don’t cease rule-breaking and conspiring in opposition to these above them after they hit a ten% threshold and change into validated as elite by Turchin’s mannequin.  As a substitute this appears extra like an interpretation of the “ruling class” as seen from the standpoint of Workforce Immiserated.

The underside line is that “[i]n order for stability to return, elite overproduction by some means must be taken care of—traditionally and usually by eliminating the excess elites via bloodbath, imprisonment, emigration, or pressured or voluntary downward social mobility.”  Finish Occasions at 106.  Turchin doesn’t say what he expects their destiny to be this time round, however the choices don’t sound nice. I suppose annoyed elite aspirants have good purpose for concern as we enter the late phases of a disintegrative section.

Tradition

This brings us to the primary of the non-structural variables that affect Turchin’s cliodynamic evaluation.  As beforehand famous, Turchin hypothesized that polygamous cultures would expertise sooner elite overproduction than monogamous cultures in pre-modern instances.  It is a very quantifiable variable, so I’m unsure it’s any much less structural than the final idea of elite overproduction, however reproductive constraints are actually an instance of a cultural variable that may should be added to a inhabitants dynamics database if you wish to get significant outcomes.

A extra pertinent instance of cultural information is Turchin’s statement that completely different societies have one thing approaching “a cultural stencil plate for collapse.”  Finish Occasionsat 40.  Various kinds of default governing buildings emerge repeatedly in several societies.  In Egypt the rulers had a navy energy base for hundreds of years, so each time the going will get powerful the nation reverts to navy rule.  Finish Occasions at 114-18.  The comparable default sample in america is plutocracy.  Finish Occasions at 112.  Turchin says, credibly I feel, that his prognosis of continual plutocracy isn’t a conspiracy idea, it’s a clear and quantifiable statement about who will get the outcomes they need from america authorities.  Finish Occasions at 126-28.

[P]lutocrats, appearing in their very own egocentric pursuits, are likely to create institutional preparations that favor the operation of wealth pumps.  A wealth pump, on the one hand, will increase in style immiseration and, on the opposite, elite overproduction (by creating extra and wealthier plutocrats).  In different phrases, a wealth pump is without doubt one of the most destabilizing social mechanisms identified to humanity.

Finish Occasions at 189.  I suppose it’s considerably comforting that america is comparatively unlikely to expertise a navy dictatorship within the close to future as a result of we shouldn’t have that cultural stencil in place (but).  So we’ve received that going for us, which is good.  Too unhealthy about our predisposition for plutocracy and wealth pumps.

Ideology

A virtually common characteristic of precrisis intervals is thus the fragmentation of the ideological panorama and the breakdown of elite ideological consensus that underlies routine acceptance of state establishments. . . . [D]ivisive—sectarian and identitarian—ideologies achieve an higher hand over unifying ones, giving us ages of discord.”  Finish Occasions at 97.

Like many different observations in Finish Occasions, this looks like frequent sense. But Turchin provides no actual rationalization of how the ten,000 12 months database helps this, or the way it might be quantified and in contrast throughout civilizations. Turchin does cite a research of members of the U.S. Congress ranked alongside a liberal-conservative axis, concluding that the U.S. went via two cycles with polarization peaking within the seventy-year interval from the 1850s to the Twenties, after which once more from the Nineteen Seventies to the current.  Finish Occasions at 98.  This roughly corresponds to Turchin’s timing of disintegrative intervals within the U.S.

The ideology piece of the sociopolitical puzzle is of appreciable curiosity to me.  As Erik Erikson stated,

[i]t is thru their ideology that social programs enter into the fiber of the following era and try to soak up into their lifeblood the rejuvenative energy of youth.  Adolescence is thus an important regenerator within the means of social evolution, for youth can supply its loyalties and energies each to the conservation of that which continues to really feel true and to the revolutionary correction of that which has misplaced its regenerative significance.  Erik Erikson, Identification Youth and Disaster at 134 (W.W. Norton 1968).

As a way to function the muse for a private id, an ideology should be sufficiently convincing to present the person an affordable stage of confidence in grownup life.  On this context, and I feel additionally in Turchin’s utilization, ideology doesn’t essentially discuss with summary, complicated, or excessive stage programs of perception—the connections between folks’s each day lives and their professed spiritual or philosophical beliefs could also be tenuous. For most individuals, ideology is no matter works to make sense out of their household, group, and occupational context.

So what are the related ideologies for Workforce Immiserated and Workforce Educated?

Turchin says that Trumpism is “not a coherent ideology, however moderately a wishful program to get one man again in energy.” However Turchin outlines a number of factors of working ideology raised lately by Tucker Carlson “which can or might not become the crystallization nucleus” for a brand new right-wing populism. In Turchin’s abstract, the democrats are recognized because the get together of the wealthy as a result of the variety agenda is cheaper than elevating wages. Mass immigration is unhealthy for American wage-earners. Army adventurism is dangerous and unproductive. Free speech is being suppressed by each legacy events. Turchin concludes that “Tucker Carlson is a really harmful man,” not as a result of Carlson is incorrect, however as a result of Carlson’s evaluation has at the least some overlap with the structural-dynamic elements that Turchin sees as being accountable for our predicament. Finish Occasions at 215-19. Turchin appears to suppose that Workforce Immiserated is inside hailing distance of determining an actionable ideology.

Turchin supplies much less perception into the working ideology of Workforce Educated, often known as the PMC.  Within the final put up I wrote earlier than embarking on this Turchin overview, I mentioned the 1977 article wherein Barbara and John Ehrenreich christened the PMC as a category.  The Ehrenreichs outlined the PMC as “salaried psychological staff who don’t personal the technique of manufacturing and whose main perform within the social division of labor could also be described broadly because the copy of capitalist tradition and capitalist class relations.”  The Ehrenreichs hypothesized that the PMC ideologized experience and rationality, and the Ehrenreichs believed in 1977 that PMC experience, rationally utilized, would naturally result in an enlightened society practising some type of socialism.

That clearly didn’t pan out.

So what’s the ideology of Workforce Educated? Matt Taibbi allegedly says that Workforce Educated is “being organized round a stronger but in addition a lot dumber, extra cultlike ideology” than Workforce Immiserated. Frankly, I’ve had problem understanding what the Workforce Educated ideology is, a lot much less assessing its efficiency.  Identification politics is clearly a part of it, and a number of other of my current posts have been engaged on the puzzle of what id politics means, beginning with what id means.  However I’m nonetheless struggling to determine if id politics has precise ideas, or if the core precept is that you will need to reveal loyalty to the credentialing establishments and/or the democrats always.  It could be ironic if the non-public identities of Workforce Educated have been organized round an ideology primarily based on id, however that ideology had no core ideas round which to prepare something.

Sadly, Finish Occasions doesn’t have rather a lot to say concerning the methodology of sorting and quantifying ideologies past the quote on the prime of this part:  we have to have a look at whether or not the prevailing ideologies are supportive of state establishments, and whether or not they’re unifying or divisive.  I suppose that is trivially straightforward if we restrict ourselves to the statement that individuals appear to be arguing rather a lot. However within the present disputes between Workforce Immiserated and Workforce Educated, I feel either side would say they’re attempting to unify America and the opposite facet is attempting to divide it.  Is it even attainable to establish a unifying ideology on this state of affairs, or to tell apart it from a divisive one?

If we’re not truly fascinated by the content material of ideologies, then we actually are again to observing whether or not folks appear to be combating rather a lot, wherein case it isn’t clear how ideology provides something as an analytical class within the database and its fashions.  Finish Occasions raises the difficulty, however doesn’t make clear it.  Turchin’s political observations did encourage some extra ideas about ideology on my half, however alas, these must be reserved for a future put up as a result of this overview is getting far too lengthy.

Group

This brings us to the ultimate cliodynamic variable, at the least for the aim of this overview.  Turchin means that regardless of how immiserated or annoyed they could be, solely “organized folks” can overthrow a state.  Finish Occasions at 174.  The ability of an curiosity group critically is determined by its social cohesion and political group.  Finish Occasions at 298.  Which means if you wish to predict a revolution, it is advisable measure the capability of lessons or curiosity teams to prepare and act successfully.

Turchin says neither workforce/class in America at present acts cohesively, besides to the extent they stereotype one another and “blame the opposite for America getting on the incorrect monitor.”  Finish Occasions at 73-79.  Once more, Turchin appears to be proper, however we’re left with little perception into how giant and small scale organizational capability will be quantified and sorted for inclusion in a ten,000 12 months database.

Summation

Turchin is clearly a wise man, and Finish Occasions incorporates quite a lot of provocative concepts. Sadly, after studying Finish Occasions I shouldn’t have a transparent sense of whether or not Turchin’s concepts are a product of the database, or whether or not he got here up with these concepts utilizing his human mind whereas he was gathering information. I believe the latter. Both approach, Turchin might be value listening to, and I’ll think about placing a few of his extra technical books into the studying queue to realize a greater understanding his strategies.

So the place does that go away us? Towards the tip of the ebook, Turchin reveals that integrative intervals are inherently exhausting to take care of as a result of the elites should make sacrifices to permit relative financial prosperity for the non-elites.  The elites all the time get bored with this in the end.  That is smart, and it’s value remembering that historical past is unlikely to finish when any explicit political supreme seems to triumph.

Maybe a very powerful perception from the MPF mannequin is that it’s too late to avert our present disaster.  However we will keep away from the following interval of social breakdown within the second half of the twenty-first century, if we act quickly to convey the relative wage as much as the equilibrium stage (thus shutting down elite overproduction) and maintain it there.  Finish Occasions at 202.

Believing that People can plan 50 years forward appears wildly optimistic, however I don’t suppose that’s the principle level. What Turchin appears to be saying is that we’re going to have a disaster quickly; whether or not we react nicely or badly throughout this fast disaster will decide whether or not we’re doomed to a different fifty years of disintegration adopted by one more disaster.  If the present disaster results in vital limitations on the wealth pump, we might enter an integrative section and issues will begin to appear higher pretty shortly, at the least by world-historical requirements.  If we fail to restrict the wealth pump, then issues will worsen till they change into catastrophic.

Who can argue with that?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email



[ad_2]

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments