Saturday, December 21, 2024
HomeeconomicsGaza Campus Protestors: At present's "Have You No Sense of Decency?"

Gaza Campus Protestors: At present’s “Have You No Sense of Decency?”

[ad_1]

Yves right here. The spectacle of a wave of campus uprisings throughout the US in opposition to Israel’s genocide in Gaza evoke many reminiscences and associations, above all to the Vietnam Conflict demonstrations of 1968. However as Michael Hudson factors out under, the Congressional marketing campaign to damage anybody who helps the protestors and even the appropriate to free speech as anti-semitic comes proper out of Senator Joe McCarthy’s playbook.

Considered one of my two Communist faculty roommates had a grandmother who was the primary to take the Fifth Modification by means of her whole grilling by McCarthy, a supply of pleasure in her circle. However then she turned a Maoist when the remainder of the household was Stalinist, so you may not longer discuss Russia at vacation gatherings.

However, each roommates have been very concerned within the South Africa solidarity motion and promoted South African divestiture. I used to be apolitical and really a lot a nerd on the time and so regarded their marketing campaign with curiosity, solely to see later that that they had been proper, and early on high of that.

There’s loads to love in Michael Hudson’s publish under, resembling his shellacking of Columbia President Nemat Shafik’s bootlicking efficiency earlier than Congress.

By Michael Hudson, a analysis professor of Economics at College of Missouri, Kansas Metropolis, and a analysis affiliate on the Levy Economics Institute of Bard Faculty. His newest e book is The Future of Civilization. Initially revealed within the Investigación Económica (Financial Analysis), produced by UNAM (Autonomous Nationwide College of Mexico)

The current Congressional hearings resulting in a massacre of college presidents brings again reminiscences from my teen-age years within the Fifties when everybody’s eyes have been glued to the TV broadcast of the McCarthy hearings. And the coed revolts incited by vicious faculty presidents making an attempt to stifle tutorial freedom when it opposes overseas unjust wars awakens reminiscences of the Nineteen Sixties protests towards the Vietnam Conflict and the campus clampdowns confronting police violence. I used to be the junior member of the “Columbia three” alongside Seymour Melman and my mentor Terence McCarthy (each of whom taught at Columbia’s Seeley Mudd College of Industrial Engineering; my job was primarily to deal with publicity and publication). On the finish of that decade, college students occupied my workplace and all others on the New College’s graduate college in New York Metropolis – very peacefully, with out disturbing any of my books and papers.

Solely the epithets have modified. The invective “Communist” has been changed by “anti-Semite,” and the renewal of police violence on campus has not but led to a Kent State-style rifle barrage towards protesters. However the frequent denominators are all right here as soon as once more. A concerted effort has been organized to sentence and even to punish at this time’s nationwide pupil uprisings towards the genocide occurring in Gaza and the West Financial institution. Simply because the Home Unamerican Actions Committee (HUAC) aimed to finish the careers of progressive actors, administrators, professors and State Division officers unsympathetic to Chiang Kai-Shek or sympathetic to the Soviet Union from 1947 to 1975, at this time’s model goals at ending what stays of educational freedom in america.

The epithet of “communism” from 75 years in the past has been up to date to “anti-Semitism.” Senator Joe McCarthy of Wisconsin has been changed by Elise Stefanik, Home Republican from upstate New York, and Senator “Scoop” Jackson upgraded to President Joe Biden. Harvard College President Claudine Homosexual (now pressured to resign), former College of Pennsylvania President Elizabeth Magill (additionally given the boot), and Massachusetts Institute of Expertise President Sally Kornbluth have been referred to as upon to abase themselves by promising to accuse peace advocates essential of U.S. overseas coverage of anti-Semitism.

The latest sufferer was Columbia’s president Nemat “Minouche” Shafik, a cosmopolitan opportunist with trilateral citizenship who enforced neoliberal financial coverage as a high-ranking official on the IMF (the place she was no stranger to the violence of “IMF riots) and the World Financial institution, and who introduced her legal professionals alongside to assist her acquiesce within the Congressional Committee’s calls for. She did that and extra, all on her personal. Regardless of being informed to not by the college and pupil affairs committees, she referred to as within the police to arrest peaceable demonstrators. This radical trespass of police violence towards peaceable demonstrators (the police themselves attested to their peacefulness) triggered sympathetic revolts all through america, met with much more violent police responses at Emory Faculty in Atlanta and California State Polytechnic, the place cellphone movies have been rapidly posted on numerous media platforms.

Simply as mental freedom and free speech have been attacked by HUAC 75 years in the past, tutorial freedom is now underneath assault at these universities. The police have trespassed onto college grounds to accuse college students themselves of trespassing, with violence paying homage to the demonstrations that peaked in Might 1970 when the Ohio Nationwide Guard shot Kent State college students singing and talking out towards America’s conflict in Vietnam.

            At present’s demonstrations are in opposition to the Biden-Netanyahu genocide in Gaza and the West Financial institution. The extra underlying disaster might be boiled all the way down to the insistence by Benjamin Netanyahu that to criticize Israel is anti-Semitic. That’s the “enabling slur” of at this time’s assault on tutorial freedom.

By “Israel,” Biden and Netanyahu imply particularly the right-wing Likud Social gathering and its theocratic supporters aiming to create “a land and not using a [non-Jewish] individuals.” They assert that Jews owe their loyalty to not their present nationality (or humanity) however to Israel and its coverage of driving the Gaza Strip’s hundreds of thousands of Palestinians into the ocean by bombing them out of their houses, hospitals and refugee camps.

.           The implication is that to help the Worldwide Court docket of Justice’s accusations that Israel is plausibly committing genocide is an anti-Semitic act. Supporting the UN resolutions vetoed by america is anti-Semitic.

            The declare is that Israel is defending itself and that protesting the genocide of the Palestinians in Gaza and the West Financial institution frightens Jewish college students. However analysis by college students at Columbia’s College of Journalism discovered that the complaints cited by the New York Instances and different pro-Israeli media have been made by non-students making an attempt to unfold the story that Israel’s violence was in self-defense.

The coed violence has been by Israeli nationals. Columbia has a student-exchange program with Israel for college kids who end their obligatory coaching with the Israeli Protection Forces. It was a few of these alternate college students who attacked pro-Gaza demonstrators, spraying them with Skunk, a foul-smelling indelible Israeli military chemical weapon that marks demonstrators for subsequent arrest, torture or assassination. The one college students endangered have been the victims of this assault. Columbia underneath Shafik did nothing to guard or assist the victims.

The hearings to which she submitted communicate for themselves. Columbia’s president Shafik was in a position to keep away from the primary assault on universities not sufficiently pro-Likud by having conferences outdoors of the nation. But she confirmed herself keen to undergo the identical brow-beating that had led her two fellow presidents to be fired, hoping that her legal professionals had prompted her to submit in a approach that will be acceptable to the committee.

I discovered essentially the most demagogic assault to be that of Republican Congressman Rick Allen from Georgia, asking Dr. Shafik whether or not she was conversant in the passage in Genesis 12.3. As he defined” “It was a covenant that God made with Abraham. And that covenant was actual clear. … ‘In the event you bless Israel, I’ll bless you. In the event you curse Israel, I’ll curse you.’ … Do you think about that to be a critical subject? I imply, would you like Columbia College to be cursed by God of the Bible?”[1]

Shafik smiled and was pleasant during this bible thumping, and replied meekly, “Undoubtedly not.”

            She might need warded off this browbeating query by saying, “Your query is weird. That is 2024, and America is just not a theocracy. And the Israel of the early 1st century BC was not Netanyahu’s Israel of at this time.” She accepted all of the accusations that Allen and his fellow Congressional inquisitors threw at her.

Her fundamental nemesis was Elise Stefanik, Chair of the Home Republican Convention, who’s on the Home Armed Providers Committee, and the Committee on Schooling and the Workforce.

Congresswoman Stefanik:  You have been requested have been there any anti-Jewish protests and also you mentioned ‘No’.

President Shafik: So the protest was not labeled as an anti-Jewish protest. It was labeled as an anti-Israeli authorities. However antisemitic incidents occurred or antisemitic issues have been mentioned. So I simply needed to complete.

Congresswoman Stefanik: And you’re conscious that in that invoice, that obtained 377 Members out of 435 Members of Congress, condemns ‘from the river to the ocean’ as antisemitic?

Dr. Shafik: Sure, I’m conscious of that.

Congresswoman Stefanik: However you don’t consider ‘from the river to the ocean’ is antisemitic?

Dr. Shafik: We now have already issued a press release to our neighborhood saying that language is hurtful and we might favor to not hear it on our campus.[2]

What an acceptable response to Stefanik’s browbeating might need been?

            Shafik may have mentioned, “The explanation why college students are protesting is towards the Israeli genocide towards the Palestinians, because the Worldwide Court docket of Justice has dominated, and a lot of the United Nations agree. I’m pleased with them for taking an ethical stand that a lot of the world helps however is underneath assault right here on this room.”

As an alternative, Shafik appeared extra keen than the leaders of Harvard or Penn to sentence and doubtlessly self-discipline college students and college for utilizing the time period “from the river to the ocean, Palestine will likely be free.” She may have mentioned that it’s absurd to say that this can be a name to get rid of Israel’s Jewish inhabitants, however is a name to present Palestinians freedom as a substitute of being handled as Untermenschen.

Requested explicitly whether or not requires genocide violate Columbia’s code of conduct, Dr. Shafik answered within the affirmative — “Sure, it does.” So did the opposite Columbia leaders who accompanied her on the listening to. They didn’t say that this isn’t in any respect what the protests are about. Neither Shafik nor another of the college officers say, “Our college is pleased with our college students taking an lively political and social position in protesting the thought of ethnic cleaning and outright homicide of households merely to seize the land that they stay on. Standing up for that ethical precept is what training is all about, and what civilization’s all about.”

            The one spotlight that I keep in mind from the McCarthy hearings was the reply by Joseph Welch, the U.S. Military’s Particular Council, on June 9, 1954 to Republican Senator Joe McCarthy’s cost that one among Welch’s attorneys had ties to a Communist entrance group. “Till this second, senator,” Welsh replied, “I feel I by no means gauged your cruelty or your recklessness. … Have you ever no sense of decency, sir? In the end, have you ever left no sense of decency?”

            The viewers broke into wild applause. Welch’s put-down has echoed for the previous 70 years within the minds of those that have been watching tv then (as I used to be, at age 15). The same reply by any of the three different faculty presidents would have proven Stefanik to be the vulgarian that she is. However none ventured to face up towards the abasement.

The Congressional assault accusing opponents of genocide in Gaza as anti-Semites supporting genocide towards the Jews is bipartisan. Already in December, Rep. Suzanne Bonamici (D-Ore.) helped trigger Harvard and Penn’s presidents to be fired for his or her stumbling over her red-baiting. She repeated her query to Shafik on April 17: “Does calling for the genocide of Jews violate Columbia’s code of conduct?” Bonamici requested the 4 new Columbia witnesses. All responded: “Sure.”

            That was the second when they need to have mentioned that the scholars weren’t calling for genocide of the Jews, however looking for to mobilize opposition to genocide being dedicated by the Likud authorities towards the Palestinians with President Biden’s full help.

Throughout a break within the proceedings Rep. Stefanik informed the press that “the witnesses have been overheard discussing how effectively they thought their testimony was going for Columbia.” This vanity is eerily reminiscent to the earlier three college presidents who believed when strolling out of the listening to that their testimony was acceptable. “Columbia is in for a reckoning of accountability. If it takes a member of Congress to power a college president to fireside a pro-terrorist, antisemitic college chair, then Columbia College management is failing Jewish college students and its tutorial mission,” added Stefanik. “No quantity of overlawyered, overprepped, and over-consulted testimony goes to cowl up for failure to behave.”[3]

            Shafik may have pointedly corrected the implications by the Home inquisitors that it was Jewish college students who wanted safety. The fact was simply the alternative: The hazard was from the Israeli IDF college students who attacked the demonstrators with navy Skunk, with no punishment by Columbia.

Regardless of being informed to not by the college and pupil teams (which Shafik was formally sure to seek the advice of), she referred to as within the police, who arrested 107 college students, tied their palms behind their backs and saved them that approach for a lot of hours as punishment whereas charging them for trespassing on Columbia’s property. Shafik then suspended them from courses.

The Conflict Between Two Sorts of Judaism: Zionist vs. Assimilationist

            An excellent variety of these protestors being criticized have been Jewish. Netanyahu and AIPAC have claimed – accurately, it appears – that the best hazard to their present genocidal insurance policies comes from the historically liberal Jewish middle-class inhabitants. Progressive Jewish teams have joined the uprisings at Columbia and different universities.

            Early Zionism arose in late 19th-century Europe as a response to the violent pogroms killing Jews in Ukrainian cities resembling Odessa and different Central European cities that have been the middle of anti-Semitism. Zionism promised to create a secure refuge. It made sense at a time when Jews have been fleeing their nations to save lots of their lives in nations that accepted them. They have been the “Gazans” of their day.

After World Conflict II and the horrors of the Holocaust anti-Semitism turned passé. Most Jews in america and different nations have been being assimilated and changing into affluent, most efficiently in america. The previous century has seen this success allow them to assimilate, whereas retaining the ethical normal that ethnic and spiritual discrimination resembling that which their forbears had suffered is flawed in precept. Jewish activists have been within the forefront of preventing for civil liberties, most visibly towards anti-Black prejudice and violence within the Nineteen Sixties and ‘70s, and towards the Vietnam Conflict. Lots of my Jewish college mates within the Fifties purchased Israel bonds, however considered Israel as a socialist nation and considered volunteering to work on a kibbutz in the summertime. There was no considered antagonism, and I heard no point out of the Palestinian inhabitants when the phrase “a individuals and not using a land in a land and not using a individuals” was spoken.

However Zionism’s leaders have remained obsessive about the outdated antagonisms within the wake of Nazism’s murders of so many Jews. In some ways they’ve turned Nazism inside out, fearing a renewed assault from non-Jews. Driving the Arabs out of Israel and making it an apartheid state was simply the alternative of what assimilationist Jews geared toward.

            The ethical stance of progressive Jews, and the best that Jews, blacks and members of all different religions and races needs to be handled equally, is the alternative of Israeli Zionism. Within the palms of Netanyahu’s Likud Social gathering and the inflow of right-wing supporters, Zionism asserts a declare to set Jewish individuals other than the remainder of their nationwide inhabitants, and even from the remainder of the world, as we’re seeing at this time.

Claiming to talk for all Jews, dwelling and lifeless, Netanyahu asserts that to criticize his genocide and the Palestinian holocaust, the nakba, is anti-Semitic. That is the place of Stefanik and her fellow committee members. It’s an assertion that Jews owe their first allegiance to Israel, and therefore to its ethnic cleaning and mass homicide since final October. President Biden additionally has labeled the coed demonstrations “antisemitic protests.”

This declare within the circumstances of Israel’s ongoing genocide is inflicting extra anti-Semitism than anybody since Hitler. If individuals all through the world come to undertake Netanyahu’s and his cupboard’s definition of anti-Semitism, what number of, being repulsed by Israel’s actions, will say, “If that’s the case, then certainly I suppose I’m anti-Semitic.”

Netanyahu’s Slander In opposition to Judaism and What Civilization Ought to Stand For

            Netanyahu characterised the U.S. protests in an extremist speech on April 24 attacking American tutorial freedom.

What’s occurring in America’s faculty campuses is horrific. Antisemitic mobs have taken over main universities. They name for the annihilation of Israel, they assault Jewish college students, they assault Jewish college. That is paying homage to what occurred in German universities within the Thirties. We see this exponential rise of antisemitism all through America and all through Western societies as Israel tries to defend itself towards genocidal terrorists, genocidal terrorists who cover behind civilians.

It’s unconscionable, it needs to be stopped, it needs to be condemned and condemned unequivocally. However that’s not what occurred. The response of a number of college presidents was shameful. Now, happily, state, native, federal officers, lots of them have responded in another way however there needs to be extra. Extra needs to be accomplished.[4]

This can be a name to make American universities into arms of a police state, imposing insurance policies dictated by Israel’s settler state. That decision is being funded by a round movement: Congress offers huge subsidies to Israel, which recycles a few of this a reimbursement into the election campaigns of politicians keen to serve their donors. It’s the similar coverage that Ukraine makes use of when it employs U.S. “assist” by organising well-funded lobbying organizations to again shopper politicians.

What sort of pupil and tutorial protest expressions may oppose the Gaza and West Financial institution genocide with out explicitly threatening Jewish college students? How about “Palestinians are human being too!” That’s not aggressive. To make it extra ecumenical, one may add “And so are the Russians, regardless of what Ukrainian neo-Nazis say.”

            I can perceive why Israelis really feel threatened by Palestinians. They know what number of they’ve killed and brutalized to seize their land, killing simply to “free” the land for themselves. They have to suppose “If the Palestinians are like us, they have to wish to kill us, due to what we’ve accomplished to them and there can by no means be a two-state resolution and we will by no means stay collectively, as a result of this land was given to us by God.”

Netanyahu fanned the flames after his April 24 speech by elevating at this time’s battle to the extent of a battle for civilization: “What’s essential now could be for all of us, all of us who’re and cherish our values and our civilization, to face up collectively and to say sufficient is sufficient.”

Is what Israel is doing, and what the United Nations, the Worldwide Court docket of Justice and a lot of the International Majority oppose, actually “our civilization”? Ethnic cleaning, genocide and treating the Palestinian inhabitants as conquered and to be expelled as subhumans is an assault on essentially the most primary ideas of civilization.

Peaceable college students defending that common idea of civilization are referred to as terrorists and anti-Semites – by the terrorist Israeli Prime Minister. He’s following the techniques of Joseph Goebbels: The way in which to mobilize a inhabitants to battle the enemy is to depict your self as underneath assault. That was the Nazi public relations technique, and it’s the PR technique of Israel at this time – and of many within the American Congress, in AIPAC and plenty of associated establishments that proclaim a morally offensive thought of civilization because the ethnic supremacy of a gaggle sanctioned by God.

The true focus of the protests is the U.S. coverage that’s backing Israel’s ethnic cleaning and genocide supported by final week’s overseas “assist.” Additionally it is a protest towards the corruption of Congressional politicians elevating cash from lobbyists representing overseas pursuits over these of america. Final week’s “assist” invoice additionally backed Ukraine, that different nation presently engaged in ethnic cleaning, with Home members waved Ukrainian flags, not these of america. Shortly earlier than that, one Congressman wore his Israeli military uniform into Congress to promote his priorities.

Zionism has gone far past Judaism. I’ve learn that there are 9 Christian Zionists for each Jewish Zionists. It’s as if each teams are calling for the Finish Time to reach, whereas insisting that help for the United Nations and the Worldwide Court docket of Justice condemning Israel for genocide is anti-Semitic.

What CAN the College students at Columbia Ask For:

            College students at Columbia and different universities have referred to as for universities to disinvest in Israeli shares, and likewise these of U.S. arms makers exporting to Israel. Given the truth that universities have turn out to be enterprise organizations, I don’t suppose that that is essentially the most sensible demand at current. Most essential, it doesn’t go to the center of the ideas at work.

            What actually is the massive public relations subject is the unconditional U.S. backing for Israel come what might, with “anti-Semitism” the present propaganda epithet to characterize those that oppose genocide and brutal land grabbing.

            They need to insist on a public announcement by Columbia (and likewise Harvard and the College of Pennsylvania, who have been equally obsequious to Rep. Stefanik) that they acknowledge that it’s not anti-Semitic to sentence genocide, help the United Nations and denounce the U.S. veto.

            They need to insist that Columbia and the opposite universities making a sacrosanct promise to not name police onto tutorial grounds over problems with free speech.

They need to insist that the president be fired for her one-sided help of Israeli violence towards her college students. In that demand they’re in settlement with Rep. Stefanik’s precept of defending college students, and that Dr. Shafik should go.

However there may be one class of main offenders that needs to be held up for contempt: the donors who attempt to assault tutorial freedom by utilizing their cash to affect college coverage and switch universities away from the position in supporting tutorial freedom and free speech. The scholars ought to insist that college directors – the disagreeable opportunists standing above the college and college students – should not solely refuse such strain however ought to take part publicly expressing shock over such covert political affect.

            The issue is that American universities have turn out to be like Congress in basing their coverage on attracting contributions from their donors. That’s the tutorial equal of the Supreme Court docket’s Residents United ruling. Quite a few Zionist funders have threatened to withdraw their contributions to Harvard, Columbia and different faculties not following Netanyahu’s calls for to clamp down on opponents of genocide and defenders of the United Nations. These funders are the enemies of the scholars at such universities, and each college students and college ought to insist on their elimination. Simply as Dr. Shafik’s Worldwide Financial Fund fell topic to its economists’ protest that there have to be “No extra Argentinas,” maybe the Columbia college students may chant “No Extra Shafiks.”

[1] https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=syPELLKpABI

[2] https://stefanik.home.gov/2024/4/icymi-stefanik-secures-columbia-university-president-s-commitment-to-remove-antisemitic-professor-from-leadership-role

[3] Nicholas FandosStephanie Saul and Sharon Otterman, “Columbia’s President Tells Congress That Motion Is Wanted In opposition to Antisemitism,” The New York Instances, April 17, 2024., and “Columbia President Grilled Throughout Congressional Listening to on Campus Antisemitism,” Jewish Journal, April 18, 2024. https://jewishjournal.com/information/united-states/370521/columbia-president-grilled-during-congressional-hearing-on-campus-antisemitism/#:~:textual content=Columbiapercent20Presidentpercent20Grilledpercent20Duringpercent20Congressionalpercent20Hearingpercent20onpercent20Campuspercent20Antisemitism

[4] Miranda Nazzaro. “Netanyahu condemns ‘antisemitic mobs’ on US faculty campuses,” The Hill, April 24, 2024.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

[ad_2]

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments