[ad_1]
J.P. Morgan Securities is suing a former worker after he left for Raymond James, accusing the advisor of soliciting shoppers and violating contractual agreements.
The financial institution is looking for a short lived restraining order towards Matthew D. Sitarski, who till lately labored at a financial institution department in Ann Arbor, Mich. When he left, Sitarski labored with about 250 households with roughly $132 million in managed property.
In response to the grievance filed in Michigan federal courtroom, Sitarski left J.P. Morgan on Jan. 31 and joined Raymond James later that very same day. The financial institution accused him of soliciting at the very least 10 former shoppers nearly instantly. One consumer stated Sitarski pushed him to maneuver his account to Raymond James so the advisor might proceed working with him.
One other consumer advised the financial institution she received a name on her cellular phone from Sitarski urging her to do the identical and meet him for an appointment, which she declined.
“The consumer additionally knowledgeable JPMorgan that Sitarski had ‘downplayed’ the expertise of the JPMorgan Personal Shopper Advisor who had been assigned to the consumer after Sitarski resigned (who has been with JPMorgan since 2016),” the grievance learn.
However Sitarski’s allegedly had some success in luring shoppers, based on the swimsuit; about six households with property totaling roughly $3.9 million have already left for Raymond James.
Raymond James didn’t reply to requests for feedback on the grievance.
Within the submitting, attorneys for J.P. Morgan warned of the results if the courtroom didn’t grant the TRO.
“Except (Sitarski’s) misconduct is instantly restrained and enjoined, different rivals of JPMorgan will probably be inspired to have interaction in the identical form of improper conduct with full impunity, the results of which is able to inflict extreme and everlasting damages on JPMorgan,” the grievance learn.
Sitarski joined J.P. Morgan in Nov. 2007, beginning on the financial institution aspect. He entered the securities portion of the enterprise as a monetary advisor affiliate in 2010 and have become an advisor two years later.
By the top of his time on the financial institution, Sitarski was a non-public consumer advisor. In response to the grievance, the financial institution referred lots of of its shoppers to Sitarski for him to pitch funding alternatives. The financial institution didn’t anticipate Sitarski to chilly name for shoppers.
By means of his employment, Sitarski allegedly might entry what J.P. Morgan deemed confidential info in consumer recordsdata, together with “consumer id, deal with, phone numbers, transactional historical past, tax info, private monetary information, banking info and funding aims.” In addition they claimed all of Sitraski’s contacts in his advisory enterprise had been pre-existing financial institution shoppers referred or assigned to him.
J.P. Morgan additionally alleged Sitarski signed a number of non-solicitation agreements throughout his tenure, barring him from soliciting shoppers for one 12 months after his employment at J.P. Morgan ended. The contracts demanded Sitarski not use or retain the financial institution’s confidential info if he resigned.
The Sitarski swimsuit isn’t the primary time J.P. Morgan accused a former advisor of breaking their agreements. In January, J.P. Morgan sued Nader Joseph Al-Mooshi, a former financial institution department advisor who’d departed for Kestra the earlier fall. The financial institution accused him of bleeding the financial institution of $40 million in property by soliciting financial institution clients and utilizing proprietary consumer info.
Final fall, J.P. Morgan leveled comparable allegations towards Daniel Sutton, a Fla.-based advisor who left the financial institution for Commonwealth.
J.P. Morgan beforehand acknowledged that financial institution department advisors like Sitarski, al-Mooshi and Sutton don’t fall beneath the protections of the Protocol for Dealer Recruiting, established in 2004 to supply advisors higher flexibility (and fewer authorized jeopardy) when soliciting shoppers after transferring between wealth administration corporations.
The financial institution claims these protections solely lengthen in-house to registered reps within the J.P. Morgan Advisors division with the titles “wealth advisor” or “wealth companion.”
[ad_2]
